Tag Archives: crime

Court Confiscates Lawyer’s ‘Contraband’ Candy

Gene Gulinson might be a sucker for jawbreakers, but do you think he's a lawbreaker, too?

Gene Gulinson might be a sucker for jawbreakers, but do you think he's a lawbreaker, too?

An Arizona attorney says that after thirty years of trying cases in Phoenix courthouses, no one has ever raised an issue about his sweet tooth. That all changed when guards recently confiscated Gene Gulinson’s jawbreakers and prohibited his bag of pastries, reports UPI:

Gene Gulinson, who practices in Phoenix, said his treatment at the Highland Justice Court in Gilbert damaged his reputation, The Arizona Republic reported. He is seeking $75,000 from the town.

Gulinson, in his notice of claim, said he has brought candy into courthouses dozens of times over the past 30 years without any trouble.

The trouble began when Gulinson went to the courthouse for a pretrial conference with a client who had two traffic tickets. He said guards first told him he could not enter carrying a bag of pastries a client had given him.

After he got rid of the pastries, guards searched his briefcase and found the jawbreakers.

A town spokeswoman said food is not allowed in the court, although Gilbert makes an exception for babies.

Another frivolous lawsuit or do you think Gulinson’s case has teeth? Afterall, parents are allowed to bring food in to the courtroom and their kids probably make bigger messes than attorneys wearing expensive suits they’d prefer not to soil.

Add to FacebookAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to TwitterAdd to TechnoratiAdd to Yahoo BuzzAdd to Newsvine

2010′s Most Notorious Nanny State Ninnies

Michelle Malkin just released her “Big Nannies of the Year” list and Reason.tv recently held its annual red carpet ‘awards gala.’ Find out who made the cut and let us know if a notorious nanny state nincompoop has been overlooked.

Add to FacebookAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to TwitterAdd to TechnoratiAdd to Yahoo BuzzAdd to Newsvine

Blizzard Strips Gun Owners of Concealed Carry Privilege

Criminals can still pack heat during a state of emergency because they've never allowed the law to stand in the way of victimizing anyone. What's wrong with this picture?

Criminals can still pack heat during a state of emergency because they've never allowed the law to stand in the way of victimizing anyone. What's wrong with this picture?

The recent blizzard that hammered North Carolina is also taking its toll on the state’s law abiding gun owners. Citizens possessing concealed carry permits who are caught packing heat during the “state of emergency” will be subject to criminal charges, per the state’s firearms law.

On Christmas Day, Lt. Governor Walter Dalton, in consultation with Governor Bev Perdue, called in the National Guard as snow covered every county in the state. Once a state of emergency is declared, concealed carry permits become null and void, and those who aren’t familiar with this bizarre stipulation in the law are subject to arrest and criminal prosecution:

It is also a misdemeanor under North Carolina law for a person to transport or possess, off his or her own premises, a dangerous weapon in an area during a declared state of emergency, or in the vicinity of a riot. N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-288.7

Can you find any logic in North Carolina’s firearms law for stripping law abiding gun owners of their concealed carry privileges during inclement weather?

Add to FacebookAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to TwitterAdd to TechnoratiAdd to Yahoo BuzzAdd to Newsvine

Overzealous Cop Busts Mom for Allowing Kid to Walk to School Alone

Just another shining example of nanny state bureaucrats telling parents how to raise their own children ... and, using the long arm of the law to force them to comply.

Just another shining example of nanny state bureaucrats telling parents how to raise their own children ... and, using the long arm of the law to force them to comply.

A police officer in Utah recently cited the mother of a kindergartner with “misdemeanor child neglect” because she allows him to walk to and from school without adult supervision. Nevermind the fact that bureaucrats’ recent spending cuts eliminated bus service for five-year-old Noah Talbot.

Rosella Talbot, a mother of six, said Noah is typically accompanied on his morning walk to school by one of his older brothers. Noah’s kindergarten class lets out early, but he has been provided by his mother with strict instructions that they practiced together for walking alone and wears a bright orange safety vest to ensure his visibility at intersections.

When a police officer recently witnessed one of the rare instances of Noah walking to school alone, he was put in the back of the squad car and driven back home to his mother.

Talbot said she informed the police officer about the safety routine she taught Noah and how she “rode a bike with her son the mile-long distance from school for more than two weeks, showing him the best route to take and the obstacles to avoid,” but was still issued a citation for “misdemeanor child neglect” because the officer did not agree with her parenting decision.

“I am not a neglectful parent, thank you very much,” she told the Deseret News. “I have just done everything I could possibly do.”

The South Jordan School District, by law, does not provide bus service for students who live less than a mile and a half from their school. A budget shortfall this year forced bureaucrats to eliminate so-called “hazardous routes,” leaving countless youngsters to navigate these dangerous streets on their own or with adult supervision, if available.

“These are some serious charges. … I can’t be a Girl Scout leader,” Talbot said. “I can’t work at a day care … I am just so frustrated.”

Talbot’s attorney is expected to enter a not guilty plea during a hearing on Jan. 5.

Agree or disagree with the police officer citing Rosella Talbot with misdemeanor child neglect because he doesn’t agree with her parenting decision? Contact Police Chief Lindsay Shepherd and let him know how you feel.

Email Chief Shepherd: lshepherd@sjc.utah.gov

Add to FacebookAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to TwitterAdd to TechnoratiAdd to Yahoo BuzzAdd to Newsvine

Santa Claus Deemed Too Offensive to Immigrant Students

Uncle Samta wants whiney liberals to grow-up and get a life!

Uncle Samta wants whiney liberals to grow-up and get a life!

Our friends at WeaselZippers.com picked-up on a report that Santa Claus has been banned from visiting Head Start classes in St. Peter, Minn., because he makes immigrant children feel ‘uncomfortable’:

The official explanation from Chris Marben, who coordinates regional Head Start programs through Mankato-based Minnesota Valley Action Council: “We have Somali families in the program. We’re respecting the wishes of families in the program.”

She didn’t say how many objections were made, but said more than one would be enough to cancel Santa.

“The simple truth is that southern Minnesota has become a much more culturally diverse society than it was a few decades ago,” she told the paper. “Part of our challenge in Head Start is providing an environment where young children from many different cultures can all feel comfortable.”

And, in related news, a Sikh child has been forbidden from wearing a necklace adorned with a religious symbol that school administrators deem a threat to public safety:

Um, this Kirpan is about as deadly as those jagged broken heart pendants. Maybe TSA will attempt a ban, too?

Um, this Kirpan is about as deadly as those jagged broken heart pendants. Maybe TSA will attempt a ban, too?

After initially telling a Bentley Elementary fourth-grader he could continue wearing a religious symbol important to his Sikh faith while they sorted out the proper way to handle the issue, Plymouth-Canton Community Schools officials have reversed themselves. 

District officials announced Thursday they were banning the Kirpan, a Sikh religious symbol that resembles a dagger and is worn after being baptized into the Sikh faith, citing a ban in the district’s Code of Conduct against weapons and weapon look-alikes …

Add to FacebookAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to TwitterAdd to TechnoratiAdd to Yahoo BuzzAdd to Newsvine

Fear of Lawsuits Prompts Town to Ban Sledding

Remember when sledding with your kids used to be 'priceless' and nobody tried to get rich from a bump or a bruise?

Remember when sledding with your kids used to be 'priceless' and nobody tried to get rich from a bump or a bruise?

Children in one Pa. town can thank trial lawyers for melting their hopes of sledding down some of the best hills this winter. Beaver bureaucrats say the threat of frivolous lawsuits for sledding incidents has prompted its insurer to demand restrictions on the traditional wintertime activity, reports ClaimsJournal.com:

Under the new rules, sledding is banned in a park overlooking the Ohio River. Sledders can go down a marked course in another park, but can’t go all the way to the top of the hill.

The Beaver County Times reports the regulations include a ban on sledding after sunset and a helmet requirement for children under 12. Metal and plastic disc sleds are also banned.

Councilwoman Shirley Sayers says officials are trying to make the best of a bad situation. She says pending lawsuits against the borough for sledding incidents prompted its insurer’s concerns.

In related news, trial lawyers are anticipating a cold reception from the new Republican majority that will be installed in the U.S. House and state governments next month. The American Association for Justice sobbed that for at least the next two years, its members will have a hard time fleecing America:

“Opponents of the tort system have gained more power in the new Congress,” AAJ officials wrote in a recent alert to members. “This new clout means all of our issues will be under attack. Denying rights to the innocent victims of medical negligence is certain to be the first order of business when the 112th Congress convenes.”

Can I get a “boo-hoo?”

Add to FacebookAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to TwitterAdd to TechnoratiAdd to Yahoo BuzzAdd to Newsvine

SEMI-VICTORY: Beach Town Backs Down on Balloon Ban

Kids in Wrightsville Beach are now free to possess balloons, but will be fined $250 if they accidentally release them.

Kids in Wrightsville Beach are now free to possess balloons, but will be fined $250 if they accidentally release them.

An attempt to the criminalize possession of balloons in a N.C. beach town has been shot down. However, Wrightsville Beach aldermen say anyone who fails to hold on to their balloon(s) will get slapped with a $250 fine.

On Nov. 25, the Nanny State Liberation Front was among the first to report that Wrightsville Beach aldermen, by a 3-2 vote, criminalized the “possession and/or release of inflated balloons on the local beachfront.”

The balloon-banning bureaucrats argue that sea turtles confuse deflated balloons for yummy jellyfish, resulting in suffocation and death.

If anyone can provide some local sea turtle casualty statistics to justify the $250 fine for intentionally or accidentally releasing balloons, sound-off below. We just haven’t read about any statistical evidence of the alleged atrocities — it’s all been emotional rhetoric coming from the aldermen, so that’s why we’re curious.

Add to FacebookAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to TwitterAdd to TechnoratiAdd to Yahoo BuzzAdd to Newsvine

Florida Official Responds to ‘Scrooge’ Accusations; Accuses Toll Collectors of Theft

CLARIFIED: There's nothing to see at Florida's toll booths except those hideous shirts employees are forced to wear.

CLARIFIED: There's nothing to see at Florida's toll booths except those hideous shirts employees are forced to wear.

The Nanny State Liberation Front today received an email from Christa Deason, a public information officer with Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise, in response to our Dec. 6 report, “Sunshine State Forbids Holiday Decorations at Toll Booths.” Interestingly, while Ms. Deason was in the process of explaining procedures and protocols, she found it necessary to accuse some toll workers of “try[ing] to steal toll money or shortchange customers or conduct other illegal activities from inside the booth.”

In the spirit of giving equal time and an equal voice to all parties in the debate and discussion, we share Ms. Deason’s concerns with our readers:

I saw your online article and wanted to respond.

There are actually three separate issues going on here as a result of a partial, inaccurately reported story on Sunday night. One issue is about employee personal expression of their holidays at the Turnpike, one is about decorating toll booths and one is about roadside displays of decorations. It has all gotten jumbled up and mixed up, and in people’s minds, it is all the same issue, so I’d like to clear this up for you.

The original story about Turnpike decorations that aired on Channel 6 in Orlando and picked up by Channel 10 in Tampa was supposed to be about a Christmas tree that was supposedly put up in the Leesburg tolls administration building on Thursday and taken down on Friday—not a toll booth. But the tree wasn’t taken down, it is in the same location–the break room–where it has been for more than a week. The reporter called at 8 p.m. on Sunday for an 11 p.m. story and I could not verify information until Monday, but he ran the story anyway.

Unfortunately, this story has been picked up by several news outlets, and no one called me to independently check the facts. We aren’t sure what the point the collector, a contracted employee of Faneuil, was hoping to make—perhaps she just got nervous and confused when the reporter stuck a microphone in front of her.

Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise has not allowed holiday decorations or any personal items in the toll booths for approximately 20 years. This directive is in place for several reasons, but is primarily about security. Toll workers are not allowed to carry any personal items into the booths, which are shared by several individuals throughout the day. This ban includes photographs, magazines and books, money, purses, wallets, cell phones, blackberries, etc. They cannot eat or smoke in the toll plazas. They are not allowed to wear hats or other headgear that can obscure their actions inside the booth. They can have nothing on their person, nor can anything be displayed in the booth that may help them conceal money, obscure security cameras or allow them to create a diversion to hide their activities. They cannot make or receive personal phone calls while in the booth (cell phones have cameras, and we can’t chance them taking photos of the equipment and the proprietary software, which could allow hackers to get in the system.) And they shouldn’t be texting or talking on the phone anyway—they should be serving our customers. While the majority of workers are very honest, there are those few individuals who will try to steal toll money or shortchange customers or conduct other illegal activities from inside the booth. The security cameras and procedures in place ensure that we are being good stewards of the public monies collected. Collectors are aware of these restrictions and procedures when they are hired.

Most importantly, however, and this drives all decisions on the Turnpike, it is about minimizing driver distractions at the toll plazas and ensuring worker and motorist safety. When a crash occurs at a toll plaza due to driver distraction, it often involves a toll worker injury— sometimes even a critical or fatal injury. Signage and instructional messaging were recently standardized at the toll booths to minimize driver distractions. The latest change in policy occurred in mid-October and, for the same reasons set forth above, extends the policy to the grassy areas in front of the toll facilities and the parking lots adjacent to the buildings.

In mid-October, we received an email complaining of demonic displays (Halloween) in the lawn area between the booths and the tolls administration building at a toll plaza in Tampa, which surprised us because nothing is supposed to be located on the right of way except information signs. We also received a few phone calls, both complaining about and complimenting them. The display was erected by contracted toll collectors with all good intentions, but they did not seek permission through the normal traffic operations protocol to set up the display. The display was removed. A similar type of display was erected in South Florida at a toll plaza. Even if they had requested permission to set up a display, it would have been denied by the traffic engineers for reasons of motorist safety as the displays created distractions at a toll facility. In this case they were Halloween displays, but they could have been dancing polar bears or a sign saying “Happy Birthday _____.” No displays or signs that distract drivers are allowed on the side of the road and if proper procedure had been followed, they never would have gone up in the first place. This doesn’t even begin to address federal and state guidelines on obstructions and hazards on the right-of-way, which includes what can and cannot be placed, and how far it can be placed, off the shoulder of the roadway because signs and other objects can be of great hazard to a motorist if they leave the roadway proper.

Just several weeks ago a distracted driver talking on his cell phone swerved to avoid hitting the car in front of him at the Osceola Parkway ramp to the Turnpike. He ran up on the sidewalk, took out the safety attenuator which closed two lanes until it could be repaired the next day (and created a huge backup on the Parkway), and smashed into the building. Toll workers have been killed and severely injured by crashes at toll plazas. Drivers should be concentrating on the car in front of them, not looking at displays on the side of the building or trying to view decorations. Open road tolling has reduced crashes at plazas by 55 to 75 percent and it is our job to make sure those crashes continue to go down.

The Florida’s Turnpike workforce is indeed diverse, and includes workers from all around the world, and they have always been free to celebrate their various secular and spiritual holidays–whether its Christmas, or Kwanza or Easter or Hanukkah–in the employee break rooms, in public areas that are not a distraction to drivers, and at their personal non-shared work stations. No official or unofficial policy or pressure has been brought to bear regarding restricting or banning employee celebrations of any holidays. The Turnpike’s employees bring in and set up seasonal or holiday displays in many if not most Turnpike buildings. Toll funds collected from motorists are not expended on ANY holiday decorations. During the holidays, Turnpike and consultant employees are free to wear holiday jewelry, bells on their shoes, or other discreet decorative items so long as they are wearing any required uniforms. Employees’ appearance is always expected to be professional and reflect a positive image in representing Florida on the Turnpike system.

If you have any questions, I’d be happy to discuss it with you or your readers at the addresses below.

Christa Deason
Public Information Officer
Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise
Turkey Lake Service Plaza, Milepost 263
P.O. Box 613069
Ocoee, FL 34761
407-264-3492
800-749-7453, ext. 3492
407-822-6479 – Fax
christa.deason@dot.state.fl.us

Add to FacebookAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to TwitterAdd to TechnoratiAdd to Yahoo BuzzAdd to Newsvine

Sunshine State Forbids Holiday Decorations at Toll Booths

Welcome to the People's Republic of Florida!

Welcome to the People's Republic of Florida!

UPDATE: 12/08/2010 – Florida Official Responds to ‘Scrooge’ Accusations; Accuses Toll Collectors of Theft

Thanks to an unspecified “record” number of motorists who have grudges against all things Christmas, Florida transportation officials have forbidden toll booth operators from displaying decorations celebrating any religious or cultural holiday.

Christmas might have been the primary target of easily offended motorists (probably the same ones with bumper stickers proclaiming, “Embrace Diversity.”), but Muslims, Jews and African-Americans who operate toll booths are also feeling the effects of the state’s ban on Christmas decorations. In the name of ‘fairness,’ Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise outlawed all reminders of religious and cultural celebrations from display in toll booths.

“The state says it comes down to money,” reports ClickOrlando.com. “It has to be fair to all people of all beliefs and it can’t spend money to buy decorations for everybody’s holidays. The simplest thing was to get rid of decorations altogether.”

Toll booth operator Lana Fontanetta said if she’s not allowed to decorate her workplace — EVEN OUT OF HER OWN POCKET — she will turn herself in to a living Christmas ornament. She thinks the line is blurred between everyone else’s ‘rights’ and her own.

“Christmas is the biggest holiday and it means so much to me,” Fontanetta told KTAR.com. “You want to feel the joy and I feel like somebody’s trying to keep me down. I am a Christian and I’m not afraid to say it.”

Contact Fla. Secretary of Transportation Stephanie C. Kopelousos and Interim Executive Director of Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise Kevin Thibault if you think they deserve lumps of coal in their stockings:

Email Stephanie C. Kopelousos: fdot@dot.state.fl.us
Tel: 850-414-5205

Email Kevin Thibault: kevin.thibault@dot.state.fl.us
Tel: 407-264-3100

Add to FacebookAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to TwitterAdd to TechnoratiAdd to Yahoo BuzzAdd to Newsvine

Happy Meal ‘Ban’ Wagon Arrives in Wisconsin City

Read the tagline. It's not just a city; it's how nanny state bureaucrats like Greg Mertzig think of themselves.

Read the tagline. It's not just a catchy slogan; it's how bureaucrats like Greg Mertzig think of themselves.

A nanny state bureaucrat in Superior, Wisc. is equating the lure of Happy Meal toys to candy cigarettes, claiming both types of novelty items encourage “lethal habits” that need to be controlled “at a very young age.”

“It was a marketing tactic by the tobacco industry to get kids to think it was cool to smoke at a very young age, develop these lethal habits at a very young age,” says City Councilor Greg Mertzig. “To a lesser extent, these toys in their Happy Meals kind of do the same thing. They reward kids and get them to think that it’s the okay thing to do at a very young age.”

Mertzig, an Iraq and Afghanistan war vet, told Wisconsin Public Radio (WPR) that he’s firing at will upon fast food restaurants that, he says, are making America’s future soldiers too fat to fight. And, he claims his constituents support his efforts to determine how and what parents feed their own children:

“They don’t meet the physical requirements to join the military so there was an argument that it was actually a national security issue. And so through the dialogue with my constituents we decided and I decided that day that we needed to do something.”

Mertzig’s proposed ordinance would “ban free toys in meals with more than 600 calories, 10% fat and can’t have any trans fat. It could also require fruits or vegetables and whole grain foods,” reports WPR’s Mike Simonson.

The Happy Meal toy ban will be offered to the city council on Dec. 7. If Mertzig musters enough support, it will be voted on by the the council members at a later date.

Superior City Attorney Frog Prell told the local FOX News affiliate that Mertzig’s efforts to mimic San Francisco and Santa Clara County, Calif. will pose “an enforcement problem if this ordinance gets any momentum, for sure.”

Contact Councilman Greg Mertzig and tell him to back down in his war against parents and their right to determine what’s best for their own children to consume:

Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1065835578
(Click “Send Gregory a Message” below his cute profile picture)

Email: mertzigg@ci.superior.wi.us

Tel: (715) 392-1148

Add to FacebookAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to TwitterAdd to TechnoratiAdd to Yahoo BuzzAdd to Newsvine